$TOKE is now $AUTO.
Migrate to continue earning rewards.Read more
tvl:
$72.73M$72.73M

Autopools vs manual liquidity providing

The difference between an Autopool and providing liquidity yourself is who makes the allocation decision. A manual liquidity provider picks a pool, supplies it, watches rates, and moves when a better venue appears — paying gas and taking slippage on every move. An Auto Finance Autopool makes that decision on-chain and automatically, spreading one deposit across several destinations and moving between them when the yield differential is large enough to pay for the move.

Providing liquidity manually gives the most control and the most work. The provider chooses the exact pool and fee tier, holds the LP position directly, and can exit any part of it at will. In exchange, they carry the whole job of monitoring: incentive programs end, rates on lending markets move with utilization, and a pool that was the best venue last week may not be this week. Every correction costs a transaction, and rewards from most venues have to be claimed and re-deployed by hand.

An Autopool converts that ongoing job into a single ERC-4626 position. One deposit is spread across every destination the Autopool holds, so the depositor is not concentrated in one venue's incentive schedule, and the rebalancing logic compares destinations continuously rather than whenever the provider happens to look. A rebalance moves the whole pool's capital in one transaction rather than each depositor paying to move their own, and yield compounds into the receipt token's value with nothing to claim.

The trade-off is selection. A manual provider can hold a venue an Autopool does not, size a position however they like, and take a concentrated bet if they want one. An Autopool depositor accepts the Autopool's permitted destination set and its allocation decisions in exchange for not having to make them, and takes on the Autopool's smart-contract risk on top of the risk of the underlying venues. Both approaches leave the assets non-custodial and withdrawable.

In practice the choice is about attention rather than sophistication. A provider who wants to express a specific view on one pool should hold that pool. A provider who wants exposure to the best available rate on an asset without tracking it themselves is describing what an Autopool does.

FAQ

Is an Autopool the same as an LP position?

No. An LP position is a stake in one liquidity pool on one DEX. An Auto Finance Autopool is an ERC-4626 vault that holds several such positions at once across different protocols and moves capital between them automatically. Depositing into an Autopool gives a single receipt token representing a share of that whole portfolio rather than a stake in any one pool.

Do I still have impermanent loss in an Autopool?

Autopools hold positions whose assets are denominated in the Autopool's base asset — an ETH Autopool holds ETH-denominated destinations, a USDC Autopool holds dollar-denominated ones — so divergence between the paired assets is much smaller than in a volatile pair, but the underlying positions are still market positions and can move against the base asset. Depositors keep exposure to the asset they deposited, not to a trading pair they did not choose.

Who pays the gas for rebalancing?

Rebalancing happens at the vault level, once for the whole pool, and only executes when the expected gain exceeds the gas and slippage cost of the move — depositors do not sign or pay for individual rebalances. A manual liquidity provider pays gas out of their own wallet for every move they make, which is why frequent small optimizations are usually not worth it for one position.